Natalie McCormack v. Winco Holdings Inc et al
| Natalie McCormack |
| Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Winco Holdings Inc |
| 5:2014cv00118 |
| January 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 Receipt of case remanded to Superior Court of California, Riverside County received on 3/26/2011 by B Millard (shb) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Minutes of In Chambers Order to Remand Case to State Court 25 ..pdf image was not attached to the docket entry. The document is attached hereto. (Attachments: #1 order remanding case, #2 Letter cv 103) (shb) |
Filing 25
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge R. Gary Klausner:, ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner remanding case to Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, Case number RIC1200516. Case Terminated. Made JS-6(shb)
|
| Filing 24 REQUEST for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision Pursuant to Local Rule 7-10 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cogbill, Karin) |
|
Filing 23
SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #14 , noticed for hearing on March 17, 2014, has been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The Court will issue a ruling after full consideration of properly submitted pleadings. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Statement (Motion related) #21 , for the following reasons: Sur-reply requires prior leave of Court. LR 7-10.; (bp)
|
| Filing 21 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED 3/7] STATEMENT of Response to Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Motion for Remand MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #14 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc. (Cogbill, Karin) Modified on 3/7/2014 (bp). |
| Filing 20 REPLY in Support of MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #14 filed by Plaintiff Natalie McCormack. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Aviva N. Roller)(Roller, Aviva) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #14 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc. (Cogbill, Karin) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Natalie McCormack, identifying Natalie McCormack. (Workman, Robin) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Clerk of Court: A Certificate of Interested Parties shall be filed by 4:00 pm on February 25, 2014 RE: MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #14 (shb)
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court #14 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and or no copies. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED REPRESENTATIVE CLASS COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc.(Cogbill, Karin) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Riverside Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Natalie McCormack. Motion set for hearing on 3/17/2014 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion, #2 Declaration Aviva N. Roller, #3 Exhibit A-K, #4 Proposed Order)(Roller, Aviva) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc, re Order,, #12 served on January 28, 2014. (Cogbill, Karin) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE.This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge R. Gary Klausner. Theresponsibility for the progress of litigation in the Federal Courts falls not only upon the attorneys in the action, but upon the Court as well. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, all counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, this Courts Order for Jury Trial, and this Courts Order for Court Trial. (See order for further details) (shb)
|
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): This matter has been transferred to the calendar of the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge. The parties are hereby notified that the reference to the ADR Program is VACATED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A scheduling conference has been placed on calendar for March 31, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiffs counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to all parties that have appeared in this action, and is further directed to give notice of the scheduling conference immediately to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Not later than 5 court days prior to the Scheduling Conference, counsel are ordered to confer and electronically file (joint) Form ADR-1 (and proposed order, Form ADR 12), selecting one of the three settlement options available. (sw)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc, re Notice of Removal, #1 and Other Supporting Documents served on January 17, 2014. (Cogbill, Karin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. Pursuant to the procedure adopted by the Court, the above entitled case has been returned to the Clerk for random reassignment. This case has been randomly reassigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Case number will now read EDCV14-00118RGK(DTBx). (adu) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (adu) |
| Filing 6 COMPENDIUM of Process, Pleadings and Orders in Support of Notice of Removal #1 Filed filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc. (adu) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/24/2014: #1 Exhibit 9-18, #2 Exhibit 19-36, #3 Exhibit 37-38, #4 Exhibit 39-44, #5 Exhibit 45 - Part 1, #6 Exhibit 45 - Part 2, #7 Exhibit 46-50, #8 Exhibit 51-61) (adu). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Winco Holdings Inc. Related Case(s): CV11-09392-SJO(DTBx). (adu) (adu). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc, identifying Corporate Parent WinCo Employee Stock Ownership Trust for Winco Holdings Inc. (adu) (adu). |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Del Ririe in Support of Notice of Removal #1 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc. (adu) (adu). |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Karin M Cogbill in Support of Notice of Removal #1 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings Inc. (adu) (adu). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number RIC1200516 with copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Discovery to Magistrate Judge David T Bristow. (Filing fee $ 400.00 paid), filed by defendant Winco Holdings Inc.(adu) (adu). |
| CONFORMED GENERAL DENIAL TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by defendant Winco Holdings Inc.(adu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
