John Michael Price Jr v California Institute for Men
| John M. Price |
| Dr Christopher Pollick and California Institute for Men |
| 5:2014cv00337 |
| February 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S. James Otero |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Conditions) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause why this action should not be dismissed under Rule 41 for failure to prosecute the action or to comply with a Court order.Plaintiff must file his response to the Courts OSC and his proposed amended complaint (or request for dismissal) by or before December 5, or the action will be terminated. The Clerk sent this order to Plaintiff at his currently-listed address and to Valley State Prison, General Inmate Mail, P.O. Box 92, Chowchilla, CA 93610-0092. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause why this action should not be dismissed under Rule 41 for failure to prosecute the action or to comply with a Court order. Plaintiff must file his response to the Courts OSC by or before June 9, or the action will be terminated. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
