Ronald James Suliin v. Carolyn W Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Ronald James Suliin v. Carolyn W Colvin

Ronald James Suliin v. Carolyn W Colvin

Plaintiff:	Ronald James Suliin
Defendant:	Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number:	5:2014cv00585
Filed:	March 25, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jean P. Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2015	Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 20 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,263.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (See Order for details) (bem)
May 20, 2015	Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 18 . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2015

Filing 21 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 20 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,263.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (See Order for details) (bem)

May 20, 2015

Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 18 . For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, it is hereby ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order remanding the case for further proceedings is GRANTED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; and (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ronald James Suliin v. Carolyn W Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Represented By:	Patrick W Snyder
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald James Suliin
Represented By:	Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?