David Anthony Beltran v. W L Montgomery
Petitioner: David Anthony Beltran
Respondent: W L Montgomery
Case Number: 5:2014cv00591
Filed: March 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER RE: COPY OF DECISION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Petitioner's request for a copy of this Court's adverse decision is GRANTED. (Docket #29 .) The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the Court's Report and Recommendation (Docket #15 ), the district judge's order accepting the R&R (Docket #16 ), and final judgment (Docket #17 ) to Petitioner. (mkr)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin ORDERING Request for copy of opinion submitted by Petitioner David Anthony Beltran received on 03/16/2016 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (mkr)
March 16, 2016 Filing 29 REQUEST for Copy of Opinion. Filed by Petitioner David Anthony Beltran. (mkr)
December 21, 2015 Filing 27 APPEAL RECORD RETURNED from 9th CCA; 15-55639. One large box of state lodge documents returned to the Central Court Los Angeles. (rsm)
December 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #22 filed by David Anthony Beltran. CCA # 15-55639. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. (car)
April 29, 2015 Filing 25 Receipt of Acknowledgment from 9th CCA as to Appeals No 15-55608. Received 1 box of state lodged documents (car)
April 28, 2015 Filing 24 RECORD ON APPEAL sent 1 large box of state lodge documents to Circuit Court re: Appeal number, 15-55639 re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #22 . (mat)
April 27, 2015 Filing 23 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 15-55639, 9th Circuit regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #22 as to Petitioner David Anthony Beltran. (mat)
April 20, 2015 Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Petitioner David Anthony Beltran. Appeal of Judgment, #17 Filed On: 9/15/15; Entered On: 9/16/15; Certificate of Appealability has been ruled on 9/15/15, see document 18. (mat)
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER REOPENING TIME TO FILE NOTICE OF APPEAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Because the Court finds that Petitioner meets all of the conditions set forth in Rule 4(a)(6), the motion to reopen the time to file an appeal is GRANTED. Petitioner may file a notice of appeal of the judgment in this matter within 14 days from the entry of this order. The clerk mailed a copy of this order to petitioner. (See Order for further details) granting #19 Request for Extension (vm)
March 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. ORDERING Letter requesting a copy of a docker or status of case submitted by Petitioner David Anthony Beltran received on March 3, 2015 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 83-2.5 No Letters to Judge; Case closed 9/15/2014. (vm)
March 16, 2015 Filing 19 REOPENING THE TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL, PURSUANT TO FRAP 4(a)(6) filed by Petitioner David Anthony Beltran. (car)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order by Judge Fernando M. Olguin denying Certificate of Appealability. (mat)
September 15, 2014 Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that Respondents motion to dismiss is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vm)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered granting Respondents motion to dismiss and dismissing this action with prejudice. Report and Recommendation (Issued) #15 (vm)
August 8, 2014 Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Re MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Case #6 (vm)
August 8, 2014 Filing 14 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Objections to R&R due by 8/22/2014. (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation) (vm)
June 13, 2014 Filing 13 OPPOSITION Response to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Case filed by Respondent W L Montgomery. (Da Silva, Anthony)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: OPTIONAL REPLY by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Attorney General may file an optional reply in further support of the dismissal motion by or before June 17, 2014. After that, the Court will take the matter under submission. re: Response in Opposition to Motion #11 . (vm)
May 23, 2014 Filing 11 OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Case #6 filed by Petitioner David Anthony Beltran. (Clough, Michael)
May 23, 2014 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael Clough counsel for Petitioner David Anthony Beltran. Filed by Petitioner Michael Clough. (Attorney Michael Clough added to party David Anthony Beltran(pty:pet))(Clough, Michael)
April 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS / STRATTON NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss this habeas action as untimely. (Docket #7 .) Petitioner's response to the motion will be due by or before May 23, 2014. (See minute order for further details.) (kl)
April 17, 2014 Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Case #6 , Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support (non-motion) #7 (Da Silva, Anthony)
April 17, 2014 Filing 7 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by respondent W L Montgomery. Re: MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Case #6 (Da Silva, Anthony)
April 17, 2014 Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 Case filed by respondent W L Montgomery. (Da Silva, Anthony)
April 10, 2014 Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Anthony Da Silva counsel for Respondent W L Montgomery. Adding Anthony Da Silva as attorney as counsel of record for W.L. Montgomery for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent W.L. Montgomery. (Attorney Anthony Da Silva added to party W L Montgomery(pty:res))(Da Silva, Anthony)
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Respondent W L Montgomery to file Motion to Dismiss/Answer by 4/30/2014. Reply due by 5/30/2014. (See Minute Order for further details) Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent) (vm)
March 26, 2014 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Pursuant to the provisions of the Local Rules, the within action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further matters as appropriate. The Court must be notified within 15 days of any change of address. (mrgo)
March 26, 2014 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by petitioner David Anthony Beltran. (mrgo)
March 26, 2014 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R Wilner.(Filing fee $ 5.00 waived), filed by petitioner David Anthony Beltran.(mrgo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Anthony Beltran v. W L Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W L Montgomery
Represented By: Anthony Da Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Anthony Beltran
Represented By: Michael Clough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?