Anthony Garcia v. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Garcia
Defendant: Old Dominion Freight Line Inc and Does 1 though 10, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2014cv01023
Filed: May 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM (In Chambers) Order REMANDING Case to State Court by Judge Dale S. Fischer: On 8/6/2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause regarding Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Having reviewed the response, the Court finds that it does not have subject matter jurisdiction. The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: #1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court) (jp)
August 15, 2014 Filing 24 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Incto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #23 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kane, Matthew)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE REMAND FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Defendant is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than August 15, 2014, why this case should not be remanded to state court. (shb)
July 17, 2014 Filing 22 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE: Judge Dale S. Fischer is participating in a pilot program regarding the submission of sealed documents. Effective July 8, 2013, all proposed documents related to under seal filings must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers e-mail at DSF_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. Please refer to the judges pilot program procedures for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 17, 2014 Filing 21 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER. The Court refers counsel to the Courts Standing Order found on the Courts website under Judge Fischers Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judges Requirements tab. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on the same website. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dp) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 14-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 13-00891 DSF(RZx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm and Judge John F. Walter to Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge EDCV 14-01023 DSF(RZx). Signed by Judge Dale S. Fischer (rn)
July 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES. (jp)
July 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE:The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on July 21, 2014 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time.ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR:The Court, having considered the parties Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: Private mediation. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: September 29, 2014 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 7, 2014 Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.. (Kane, Matthew)
July 7, 2014 Filing 16 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Anthony Garcia (Katofsky, Alex)
June 27, 2014 Filing 15 ANSWER to Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.(Kane, Matthew)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT by Judge John F. Walter, re Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference and Further Extend Defendant's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Due to Unavailability of Lead Counsel and to Facilitate Mediation #13 . NO SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE. Lead counsel will not be required to attend Scheduling Conference. (jp)
June 23, 2014 Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 09/24/14, Joint STIPULATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from 07/21/14 to 10/06/14 filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kane, Matthew)
June 16, 2014 Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. correcting Notice of Removal, #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I)(Beldner, Sabrina)
June 12, 2014 Filing 11 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Old Dominion Freight Line Inc answer now due 6/27/2014, re Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.(Kane, Matthew)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 10 COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for July 21, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 16, U.S. Courthouse, 312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before July 7, 2014. (jloz)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. Read this Order carefully. It controls the case and differs in some respects from the Local Rules. (jloz)
May 23, 2014 Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Old Dominion Freight Line Inc answer now due 6/13/2014, filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc.(Beldner, Sabrina)
May 22, 2014 Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. Pursuant to the procedure adopted by the Court, the above entitled case has been returned to the Clerk for random reassignment. This case has been randomly reassigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Case number will now read EDCV14-01023-JFW(FFMx). (adu)
May 21, 2014 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (adu)
May 21, 2014 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (adu)
May 21, 2014 Filing 4 NOTICE of No Related Case(s) filed by defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. Related Case(s): None. (adu) (adu).
May 21, 2014 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. (adu) (adu).
May 21, 2014 Filing 2 DECLARATION of Ken Ludwig in Support of Notice of Removal #1 filed by Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. (adu) (adu).
May 21, 2014 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS1404636 with copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Frederick F Mumm. Filing fee $400.00 - paid, filed by defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc. (adu) (adu).
May 21, 2014 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Anthony Garcia. (adu)
May 21, 2014 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Garcia, upon Defendant Old Dominion Freight Line Inc served on 4/21/2014, answer due 5/21/2014. Original Summons NOT returned. (adu)
May 21, 2014 CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Old Dominion Freight Line Inc amending the Complaint, filed by plaintiff Anthony Garcia (adu)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Garcia v. Old Dominion Freight Line Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Garcia
Represented By: Alex P Katofsky
Represented By: Kenneth S Gaines
Represented By: Daniel F Gaines
Represented By: Sepideh Ardestani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Old Dominion Freight Line Inc
Represented By: Matthew Charles Kane
Represented By: Sabrina A Beldner
Represented By: Sean Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 though 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?