R.R. III, et al v. City of Banning et al
| R. R., R. R., III, Gloria Rodriguez, Maria Rodriguez and Richard Rodriguez |
| City of Banning and Does |
| 5:2014cv01430 |
| July 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 90 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: The Complaint, in its entirety and as to each and every claim for relief and any and all defendants, is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). The settlement is further memorialized in a written settlement agreement. The parties shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees ari sing out of and/or connected with this matter, including any such fees or expenses potentially recoverable under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988, except for those specifically negotiated for and previously agreed in writing prior to the execution of this dismissal. (gk)
|
|
Filing
38
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Proceedings: Granting 31 Motion to Dismiss Everett Babcock's Counter-claim. The Court GRANTS with prejudice plaintiff/counter-defendant Rodriguez's motion to dismiss defendant/counter-claimant Officer Babcock's counterclaim in its entirety. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
