David L. Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC et al
| David L. Totten |
| Does, Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC and Molycorp, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv01766 |
| August 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Labor: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: The Court, for purposes of this Judgment, adopts all defined terms as set forth in the Stipulation filed in this case. As contemplated by the Stipulation, Clas s Counsel have filed a motion for approval of certain fees, costs, and enhancement payments, and the Court has approved the following payments: (a) attorneys' fees payable to Class Counsel in this matter in the amount of $937,500; (b) all owable costs in this matter in the amount of $21,168.62, and (c) enhancement award of $20,000 to the Class Representative for expending significant time and effort assisting Class Counsel. The Court finds that such amounts, and KBR's agreement to pay such amounts, are fair and reasonable. KBR is directed to make such payments out of the Maximum Settlement Amount to be deposited in the Qualified Settlement Fund, through the Claims Administrator, in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation. 11. As further contemplated by the Stipulation, the claims administration costs of $30,000 to the Claims Administrator, Rust Consulting, Inc. (Rust), are fair and reasonable. See document for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
|
|
Filing
41
IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE STAYED by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The parties are hereby ordered to show cause why this action should not be stayed as a result of the filing of Defendant Molycorp, Inc.s bankruptcy petition. If a written response is not filed by August 14, 2015, the Court will issue an order staying and administratively closing the action. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
