Solar Sun Rings, Inc. v. Secard Pools et al
| Solar Sun Rings, Inc. |
| Does, DARIN GIBSON, In The Swim, Lowes Companies, Inc., Overstock.com, POOLCENTER.COM, Inc., Pinch A Penny, Inc., Pool Supply Unlimited, EDMUND SECARD, JOE SECARD, SPLASH-A-ROUND POOLS, Sears Holdings Corporation, Secard Pools, Sun Wholesale Supply, Inc., The Home Depot, Inc., WAYFAIR, LLC and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv02417 |
| November 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 95 (See Order for details) (dts)
|
|
Filing
94
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 93 While the Court appreciates the parties use of the sample stipulated protective order, the parties have omitted language defining Action in paragraph 2.1. The Court, therefore, declines to issued the proposed protective order to which the parties have stipulated at this time. (dts)
|
|
Filing
92
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re: Protective Order. The parties are advised that the Court declines to issue the proposed protective order to which they have stipulated for the reasons stated in the Court's Order (See Order for details) (dts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
