Tomas Grande Grajeda, Jr v. Unknown
|Tomas Grande Grajeda, Jr
|December 4, 2014
|US District Court for the Central District of California
|Josephine L. Staton
|Nature of Suit:
|Habeas Corpus (General)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 3, 2017
JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, in favor of M D Biter against Tomas Grande Grajeda, Jr Related to: Report and Recommendation (Issued) 41 . IT IS ADJUDGED that Petitioner is discharged from all consequences of the street gangallegation append ed to his conviction for carrying a loaded firearm in public in San Bernardino County Superior Court Case No. FVA-025452, the portion of his sentence based thereon is vacated, and the San Bernardino County Superior Court shall resentence Petitioner accordingly within sixty (60) days. The Petition is denied in all other respects. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dfi)
|January 28, 2015
Minutes in Chambers by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym, Order to Show Cause Re Filing of Notice of Appearance. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order, that is, by February 11, 2015, respondent is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why sanctions should not be imposed for respondents failure to comply with a court order. (kca)
|December 11, 2014
Minutes in Chambers by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Order to Show Cause Why Petition Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Name Proper Respondent. Petitioner is ordered to file with the court a written response to the Order to Show Cause on or before January 2, 2015 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?