Johnson Safety Inc v. Voxx International Corporation et al
| Johnson Safety Inc |
| Invision Automotive Systems Inc, Voxx Electronics Corporation and Voxx International Corporation |
| 5:2014cv02591 |
| December 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 122 ; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 134 ;DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 119 ; and DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY 117 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc) Modified on 4/19/2017. (lc).
|
|
Filing
95
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II .(lc) Modified on 11/16/2016. (lc).
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: RESCHEDULING by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Due to the Courts case load and scheduling conflicts, the Court wishes tocontinue the claim construction hearing, currently scheduled for March 4, 2016(ECF No. 88.), until October 21, 2 016. However, the Court does not wish to prejudice any party in pursuit of its scheduling needs, and therefore asks parties to SHOW CAUSE, in writing by February 29, 2016, if the amended schedule below will unduly prejudice any party. Should a party fail to respond to this Order, their silence will be taken as acceptance of the modified schedule.(SEE DOCUMENT FOR PROPOSED SCHEDULE). (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
