Timothy Jones v. County of San Bernardino et al
Plaintiff: |
Timothy Jones |
Defendant: |
County of San Bernardino, Does, John McMahon and Deputy Taylor |
Case Number: |
5:2015cv00080 |
Filed: |
January 14, 2015 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Presiding Judge: |
Virginia A. Phillips |
Presiding Judge: |
Sheri Pym |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 22, 2016 |
Filing
68
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered as follows: (1) In favor of plaintiff on his claims for excessive force under the Fourteenth Amendment, battery, and negligence and awarding $ ;45,000.00 in damages on plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim; and (2) in favor of defendants John McMahon and the County of San Bernardino on plaintiff's custom and practice, failure to train, and ratification claims. Any motion for attorneys fees or application to tax costs shall be filed in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Local Rules following the entry of Judgment by the Court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
|
August 17, 2016 |
Filing
67
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. For the reasons stated above, the Court finds in favor of Jones on hisFourteenth Amendment, battery, and negligence claims. The Court awardscompensatory damages in the amount of $45,000.00 on Joness FourteenthAmendment claim. The Court finds in favor of McMahon and the County on theMonell claims. (dc)
|
May 31, 2016 |
Filing
57
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (In Chambers Order) by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/2/2016. On or before June 2, 2016, the parties are ORDERED to show good cause in writing, if any exists, why the Court should not continue the trial date, or dismiss the action for lack of diligent prosecution and/or failure to comply with the Courts prior Order. See Minute Order for details. (vp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?