American Western Door & Trim v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company et al
American Western Door & Trim |
Arch Specialty Insurance Company and Does |
5:2015cv00153 |
January 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Beverly Reid O'Connell |
Sheri Pym |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to amend in the time allotted by the Court. A n appropriate response to this order will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint by April 10, 2015. Plaintiff must file a response to this order as well as an amended complaint by no later than Friday, April 24, at 4:00 p.m. (rfi) |
Filing 19 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: The Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss and STRIKES Plaintiff's class allegations. All of Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, April 10, 2015 at 12 p.m.The hearing set for March 23, 2015 is VACATED. 13 14 (rfi) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/13/2015. (jloz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.