Jesse L Youngblood v. Lori R DiCarlo et al
Jesse L Youngblood |
1-100 Does, Lori R DiCarlo, John Doe (five), John Doe (four), John Doe (one), John Doe (three) and John Doe (two) |
5:2015cv00249 |
February 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
John A. Kronstadt |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the full filing fee in conformity with the Court's 8/24/16 Order. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (sp) |
Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Within 21 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing, if any there be: (1) why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice with respect to the claims against Warden DiCarlo and the claims for damages against Defendants in their official capacities, and without prejudice with respect to Plaintiff's remaining claims, because of: (a) failure to obey a court order; and (b) failure to effect timel y service; and (2) why Plaintiff's IFP status should not be revoked on the ground that Plaintiff has suffered three or dismissals qualifying as "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(g). Failure timely to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of the action. (sp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.