Drake Ward v. City of Barstow et al
Drake Ward |
City of Barstow, John Does, Michael Dowd, Andrew Espinoza, Jr, Keith Libby, Albert Ramirez, Jr and Lisa Rogan |
5:2015cv00444 |
March 9, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Robert N. Block |
Dale S. Fischer |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 154 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Fourth Amended Complaint and entire action is dismissed with prejudice. 153 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
Filing 61 ORDER ACCEPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Dale S. Fischer. No objections to the Report and Recommendation 56 have been filed. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of t he United States Magistrate Judge. Within thirty days of the conclusion of Plaintiffs criminal proceedings in the Superior Court for the County of San Bernardino, the parties shall file a status report with the Court regarding the outcome of those proceedings. |
Filing 58 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dale S. Fischer. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) defendant Rogan's Motion to Dismiss is granted; (2) defendant Dowd's Motion to Dismiss is granted; and (3) the First Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend as to these two defendants 54 . (jtil) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.