Derrick Nelson v. Frank Wilson
Petitioner: Derrick Nelson
Respondent: Frank Wilson
Case Number: 5:2015cv00571
Filed: March 25, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow Related to: Order 11 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derrick Nelson v. Frank Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick Nelson
Represented By: Ashfaq G Chowdhury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Frank Wilson
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Represented By: Elizabeth J Stevens
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?