Jeffrey Roy Crosby v. Richard Ives
Petitioner: Jeffrey Roy Crosby
Respondent: Richard Ives
Case Number: 5:2015cv01263
Filed: June 29, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: Final judgment is herebyentered in favor of the respondent and against petitioner Jeffrey Roy Crosby WITH PREJUDICE. (shb)
June 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jeffrey Roy Crosby v. Richard Ives
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeffrey Roy Crosby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Richard Ives
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?