In Re Ismael Ramirez
| Federal National Mortgage Association |
| Ismael Ramirez |
| Ismael Ramirez |
| 5:2015cv01307 |
| July 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: On June 29, 2015, appellant Ismael Ramirez filed a Notice of Appeal challenging an Order issued in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Appellantfiled an Amended Notice of Appeal on June 30, 2015, that contained a Statement of Election to Transfer Appeal to the District Court. The action was then assigned to this Court, and the Court issued a Notice Regarding Appeal from Bankruptcy Court on July 2, 2015. [T]h e Court notes despite being clearly notified of the requirements for prosecuting a bankruptcy appeal and the consequences for failing to do so Appellant has failed to satisfy those requirements. Additionally, although the Court has considered lesse r alternatives to dismissal of this appeal, Appellant's history of failing to comply with deadlines and and not requesting extensions of time, supports the conclusion that there is no other lesser sanction or remedy that will motivate Appellant to prosecute this appeal in a timely and satisfactory manner. [T]he Court dismisses this appeal. See document for details. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
