Muscle Bar LLC v. Musclepharm Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Muscle Bar LLC
Defendant: Does and Musclepharm Corporation
Case Number: 5:2015cv01345
Filed: July 7, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter: In the Notice of Settlement filed on 3/7/2016, Dkt. No. 37 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice s ubject to either party reopening the action on or before 4/7/2016. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until 4/7/2016. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION - Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than September 4, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution The Court will consider the filing of Answer by the defendant or an application for entry of default pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) on or before the above date as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. No oral argument on this matt er will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (sr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Muscle Bar LLC v. Musclepharm Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Musclepharm Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Muscle Bar LLC
Represented By: Thomas Salazar Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?