Yolanda Godoy v. Winco Holdings, Inc. et al
Yolanda Godoy |
Justin Lee, Winco Holdings, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
5:2015cv01397 |
July 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino. (shb) |
Filing 30 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court of California, San Bernardino. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court of California, San Bernardino. (shb) |
Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: GRANTING #17 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court Case Remanded to Superior Court of California, San Bernardino, CA CIVDS 1402507. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (shb) |
Filing 28 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kristina M Launey counsel for Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. Andrew C. Crane is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant WinCo Holdings, Inc.. (Launey, Kristina) |
Filing 27 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Rachel Gradstein counsel for Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. Adding Rachel L. Gradstein as counsel of record for WINCO HOLDINGS, INC. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Attorney Rachel Gradstein added to party Winco Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gradstein, Rachel) |
Filing 26 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for Settlement Conference. (lc) |
Filing 25 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright II: THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES. Jury trial: 3/22/16 9:00 AM; File final trial exhibit stipulation: 3/10/16; hearing on motions in limine: 2/22/16 1:30 PM; Final Pretrial Conference: 3/7/16 1:30 PM; motions in limine, proposed voir dire questions and proposed voir dire questions and agreed to statement of case: 3/7/16; lodged Pretrial conference order and pretrial exhibit stipulation, file trial briefs, contentions of fact and law, exhibit and witness lists, status report regarding settlement, agreed upon set of instructions and verdict forms, joint statement regarding disputed instructions verdicts etc: 2/16/16; last day for hearing motions: 1/25/16; last date to conduct settlement conference: 1/19/16; discovery cutoff: 12/14/15; last date to amend pleadings or add parties: 12/28/15. (lc) |
Filing 24 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc... (Launey, Kristina) |
Filing 23 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error: MINUTES re summary judgment motions no. 236 and 237 #21 was docketed on this case in error, should have been under ED CV 13-01670-ODW(DTBx) Patricia Stewart, D.O. v. American Association (lc) |
Filing 22 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION to Remand Case #17 scheduled for September 14, 2015 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc) |
Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Hearing on MOTION for Summary Judgment 236 and 237 , scheduled for September 14, 2015 at 1:30 P.M., are hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matters stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue. (lc) (DOCKETED ON THIS CASE IN ERROR SHOULD HAVE BEEN UNDER EDCV 13-1670 ODW (DTBx) Modified on 9/9/2015 (lc). |
Filing 20 REPLY Reply to Defendant's Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #17 filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Godoy. (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
Filing 19 DECLARATION of Andrew C. Crane IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #17 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 18 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court #17 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to San Bernardino Superior Court filed by plaintiff Yolanda Godoy. Motion set for hearing on 9/14/2015 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
Filing 16 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by plaintiff Yolanda Godoy.. (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
Filing 15 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Godoy, (Lovretovich, Joseph) |
Filing 14 NOTICE filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)]; SCHEDULING CONFERENCE [FRCP 26(f)] by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Scheduling Conference set for October 5, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. (See attached document for requirements.) (lom) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. (See attached document for requirements.) (lom) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (aco) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. Pursuant to the procedure adopted by the Court, the above entitled case has been returned to the Clerk for random reassignment. This case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. The new case number will now read 5:15-cv-01397 ODW(SPx). (aco) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (aco) |
CONFORMED COPY OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT against Defendants Justin Lee and Winco Holdings, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Yolanda Godoy. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON FEBRUARY 28, 2014. SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL]. (aco) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of Andrew C. Crane re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of David M. Butler re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc., identifying WinCo Holdings, Inc.,Yolanda Godoy. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Crane, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of San Bernardino, case number CIVDS 1402507 Receipt No: 0973-16075887 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Winco Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit) (Attorney Andrew Christian Crane added to party Winco Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Crane, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.