Live Face On Web, LLC, v. AZ Metroway, Inc. et al.
Plaintiff: Live Face On Web, LLC,
Defendant: AZ Metroway, Inc., Does and Jose Murguia
Case Number: 5:2015cv01701
Filed: August 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS AZ METROWAY, INC. AND JOSE MURGUIA PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 55(b) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS THAT Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants AZ Metroway and Murguia pursuant to F .R.F.P. 55(b) 24 is hereby GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff on all claims, and AZ Metroway and Murguia shall be jointly and severally liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $34,393.30 (comprising actual damages of $30,000.00, attorney's fees of $3,396.65, costs of $996.65). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this judgment. (gk)
October 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION RE: RULING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 32 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Court's default judgment is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
August 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART plaintiff's motion for default judgment against defendants AZ Metroway, Inc. and Jose Murguia 24 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff on all claims, and AZ Metroway and Murguia shall be jointly and severally liable to plaintiff in the amount of $34,393.30 (comprising statutory damages of $30,000, attorney's fees of $3,39 6.65, and costs of $996.65). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this judgment. Plaintiff's counsel shall submit a Proposed Judgment in accordance with this order, forthwith. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Live Face On Web, LLC, v. AZ Metroway, Inc. et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AZ Metroway, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Murguia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Live Face On Web, LLC,
Represented By: Imran F Vakil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?