Toby Jones v. Elvin Valenzuela
Petitioner: Toby Jones
Respondent: Josie Gastelo
Case Number: 5:2015cv02350
Filed: November 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 36 JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 35 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (afe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Toby Jones v. Elvin Valenzuela
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Josie Gastelo
Represented By: Amber Nicole Wipfler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Toby Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?