Elena E Moore v. Transunion Corp a Delaware Corporation et al
| Elena E Moore |
| Allied Interstate Inc, Credit Solutions Corp., Does 1-10, Equifax Inc.,, Experian Infomation Solutions Inc, HSBC Bank USA, Northland Group Inc, Oxford Collection Agency Inc and Transunion Corp |
| 5:2015cv02419 |
| November 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT CREDIT SOLUTIONS CORP. by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant to the Stipulation 138 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Credit Solutions Corp. is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
121
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to s how cause, in writing, on or before December 5, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission with out oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant Capital One did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
42
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before April 11, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
|
Filing
27
[In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before March 9, 2016, why this action should no t be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
