William Bower et al v. County of Riverside et al
| William Bower and Michelle Finlayson |
| Brother's Towing, Inc., County of Riverside, Does, Juan Duran, Chad C McVay, Christopher S Porter, Paul M Verostek, Webcop Interactive Systems, Inc. and Westech Patrol Specialists, Inc. |
| 5:2015cv02660 |
| December 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S. Fischer |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
175
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (SEE JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/13/2020. (rfi)
|
|
Filing
90
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) RE: ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS BOWER AND FINLAYSON AND PLAINTIFFS' COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED FOR FAILURE TO FILE CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Additionally, in light of Plaintiffs' failure to submit a timely settlement conference statement, the August 22, 2018 settlement conference is VACATED. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/22/2018. (dts)
|
|
Filing
13
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/11/2016. Please refer to the Court's order for specifics. (cr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
