Richard Craig Miller v. Jeffrey Beard
Petitioner: Richard Craig Miller
Respondent: Dr. Jeffrey Beard
Case Number: 5:2016cv00105
Filed: January 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Scott
Presiding Judge: Ronald S.W. Lew
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: In accordance with the Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed herein 4 , IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is summarily dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jtil)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Craig Miller v. Jeffrey Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dr. Jeffrey Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Craig Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?