Nanette v. Government Employees Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Dunlop Nanette
Defendant: Government Employees Insurance Company
Case Number: 5:2016cv00629
Filed: April 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Presiding Judge: Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO REMAND CASE TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips remanding case to San Bernardino County Superior Court, Case number CIVDS 1603292. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (mrgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nanette v. Government Employees Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Government Employees Insurance Company
Represented By: D Amy Akiyama
Represented By: Gregory P Konoske
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dunlop Nanette
Represented By: Sanford Alan Kassel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?