Norman Halstead et al v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company PG and E et al
| Aquilla Frederick, Gary Halstead and Norman Halstead |
| Does and Pacific Gas and Electric Company PG and E |
| 5:2016cv00696 |
| April 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| George H. King |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Re: Notice of Death of Plaintiff Gary Halstead by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato,IT IS ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order: 1. Plaintiffs Norman Halstead and Aquilla Frederick shall make a reasonable investigation into the status of Decedent's estate and, if a representative of the estate is discovered, shall serve a suggestion of death of Decedent in accordance with Rules 4 and 25 on the representative, and shall file a proof of service reflecting proper service of the suggestion of death on the representative of Decedent's estate; or 2. If Plaintiffs Norman Halstead and Aquilla Frederick contend either of them is a proper representative of Decedents estate, they shall file a proper motion for substitution. Because Plaintiffs do not purport to be licensed attorneys in their own right, Plaintiffs are advised that any plaintiff that qualifies as a successor in interest must obtain legal representation if the Decedents case is to proceed further. Johns v. Cty. of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1997) (While a non-attorney may appear pro se on his own behalf, [h]e has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself. (quoting C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987))); or 3. If Plaintiffs Norman Halstead and Aquilla Frederick are unable to effectuate service on a representative of Decedents estate, then they shall file a declaration concerning their efforts to comply with this Order. This Order is without prejudice to Defendant seeking any appropriate relief. (dts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
