David Kent Fitch v. Calvin Johnson
Petitioner: David Kent Fitch
Respondent: Warden Calvin Johnson
Case Number: 5:2016cv00700
Filed: April 13, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter. Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Kent Fitch v. Calvin Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Kent Fitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Calvin Johnson
Represented By: Garrett Coyle
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?