Sara B. Drasin v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Sara B. Drasin v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Sara B. Drasin
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	5:2016cv00798
Filed:	April 26, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Dale S. Fischer
Presiding Judge:	Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 25, 2018	Filing 38 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 37 . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dv)
July 28, 2017	Filing 31 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. On or before 8/7/2017, Plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) show good cause in writing, if any exists, why Plaintiff has not timely submitted her portion of the joint submission, and why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute; or (b) prepare and file what the Court will consider a final stipulation to extend the deadlines for preparation of a joint submission. Plaintiff is expressly forewarned that if she fails to do either, the Court will deems such failure a further violation of a Court order justifying a dismissal and also deem such failure as further evidence of a lack of prosecution. (nbo)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 25, 2018

Filing 38 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 37 . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dv)

July 28, 2017

Filing 31 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. On or before 8/7/2017, Plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) show good cause in writing, if any exists, why Plaintiff has not timely submitted her portion of the joint submission, and why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to prosecute; or (b) prepare and file what the Court will consider a final stipulation to extend the deadlines for preparation of a joint submission. Plaintiff is expressly forewarned that if she fails to do either, the Court will deems such failure a further violation of a Court order justifying a dismissal and also deem such failure as further evidence of a lack of prosecution. (nbo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sara B. Drasin v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara B. Drasin
Represented By:	Steven G Rosales
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?