Clark James Cavanaugh et al v. City of Fontana et al
| Clark James Cavanaugh, Jr, Ruth Annette Cavanaugh, Mary Lucretia Holton, Sharon Elaine Shelton and Linda Darline Wynn |
| City of Fontana, Does and Efrain Gonzalez |
| 5:2016cv01001 |
| May 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION 104 , it is hereby ordered that: The Third Amended Complaint filed the above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Both (1) Plaintiffs' resp onse to this Order and (2) Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, if any, shall be filed by no later than Monday, July 25, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiffs' failure to timely oppose Defendants' Motion. If Plaintiffs respond accordingly, Defendants' Reply is due by no later than Monday, August 1, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Both (1) Plaintiffs' resp onse to this Order and (2) Plaintiffs' opposition to the Motion to Dismiss, if any, shall be filed by no later than Friday, June 10, 2016, at 4:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiffs' failure to timely oppose Defendants' Motion.IT IS SO ORDERED. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
