Marcia Exie Hicks v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Marcia Exie Hicks v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Marcia Exie Hicks v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Marcia Exie Hicks
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	5:2016cv01469
Filed:	July 6, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Dolly M. Gee
Presiding Judge:	Karen L. Stevenson
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 20, 2017	Filing 27 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Based upon the parties Stipulation For Award Of EAJA F ees ("Stipulation") 26 , which was filed on September 15, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that fees in the amount of $4,400.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of $400.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, shall be awarded, subject to terms of the Stipulation. (gr)
June 19, 2017	Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, in favor of Marcia Exie Hicks against Carolyn W. Colvin Related to: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 , Memorandum & Opinion, 24 IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed, and the above-captioned action is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 20, 2017

Filing 27 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Based upon the parties Stipulation For Award Of EAJA F ees ("Stipulation") 26 , which was filed on September 15, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that fees in the amount of $4,400.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of $400.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, shall be awarded, subject to terms of the Stipulation. (gr)

June 19, 2017

Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, in favor of Marcia Exie Hicks against Carolyn W. Colvin Related to: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 , Memorandum & Opinion, 24 IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is reversed, and the above-captioned action is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcia Exie Hicks v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcia Exie Hicks
Represented By:	Monica Perales
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?