Vincent S Phillips v. Dean Borders et al
||Vincent S Phillips
||Dean Borders, Dr Chin, Does, Han Duong, Dr Froog and Dr Oh
||July 18, 2016
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Michael W. Fitzgerald
||Douglas F. McCormick
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 5, 2020
AMENDED ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 144 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 120 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that : 1. The Motion (Dkt. 120) is GRANTED and the claims against defendant Dr. Duong in the SAC are dismissed with prejudice; and 2. Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action in accordance with this Order and the Court's prior dismissal Order (Dkt. 74). (see document for further details) (hr)
|August 4, 2020
JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 152 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff shall take nothing and this action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
|September 26, 2018
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 68 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint 44 . 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved an d accepted; 2. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Warden Borders and Dr. Farooq. Because Plaintiff indicated in the Notice (Dkt. 72) that he wishes to dismiss his claims against Warden Borders and Dr. Farooq, the Motion to Dismiss as to Warden Bo rders and Dr. Farooq is granted without leave to amend. 3. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Dr. Duong. Dr. Duong shall file and serve her answer to the operative Second Amended Complaint by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. (see order for further details) (hr)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?