Manisha L. Penesa v. California Institution for Women et al
| Manisha L. Penesa |
| James A. Brown, III, Shawn Brown, California Institution for Women, K. Hughes, David Lopez, A W Martel, Michael Martel, Rebecca Reyes and Edward Wamil |
| 5:2016cv01878 |
| January 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Rozella A. Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
JUDGMENT by Judge John W. Holcomb. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: This action is DISMISSED without prejudice with respect to Defendant Shawn Brown. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice with respect to Defendants Edward Wamil, David Lopez, Michael Martel, Kimberly Hughes, and Rebecca Reyes. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (See document for further details) (yl)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by District Judge Dolly M. Gee for Interim Report and Recommendation (Issued) 73 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint 49 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED-IN-PART and Defendants Wamil, Lopez, Martel and Hughes are dismissed from this action with prejudice and without leave to amend; (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED-IN-PART as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Reyes; and (3) Defendant Reyes shall file an Answer to the Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment claims against her within 14 days of the date of entry of this order. (see order for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing
70
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL OF SHAWN BROWN by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must show cause in writing, on or before June 18, 2018, why Plaintiff's claims against Shawn Brown should not be dismissed due to her failure to prosecute. (see order for details) (hr)
|
|
Filing
58
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, and this action is dismissed. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 57 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, on or before January 13, 2018, why her action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff may also discharge this Order by filing a response to Defendants' Motion on or before January 13, 2018. (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
