Hoang Minh Le et al v. Efthimios Glentis et al
| Hoang Minh Le |
| Efthimios Glentis and Sofia Glentis |
| 5:2016cv01966 |
| September 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| George H. Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER RE STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 25 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
24
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu. On April 25, 2017, Plaintiff Hoang Minh Le filed a Notice of Settlement. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause hearing re: Settlement for June 26, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. The parties are advised that the order to show cause will be vacated and no appearance will be required provided that a Stipulation to Dismiss, with a proposed order, is filed by noon on June 23, 2017. All previously set deadlines and dates are vacated and taken off-calendar. The order to show cause issued on April 24, 2017 is discharged. (jy)
|
|
Filing
11
(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge George H. Wu. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/15/2016. (kss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
