Salvador Manuel Mendoza, III v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Salvador Manuel Mendoza, III v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Salvador Manuel Mendoza, III v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Salvador Manuel Mendoza, III
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	5:2016cv02190
Filed:	October 17, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 16, 2018	Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees ("Stipulation") 18 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorn ey fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA") in the amount of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX DOLLARS and 12 cents ($2,526.12), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (dro)
July 5, 2017	Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. 16 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 16, 2018

Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees ("Stipulation") 18 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorn ey fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA") in the amount of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED TWENTY-SIX DOLLARS and 12 cents ($2,526.12), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. (dro)

July 5, 2017

Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. 16 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salvador Manuel Mendoza, III v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Salvador Manuel Mendoza, III
Represented By:	William M Kuntz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?