Jennifer Marie Edge-Ballantine v. Paris David Brunner
Plaintiff: Jennifer Marie Edge-Ballantine
Defendant: Paris David Brunner
Case Number: 5:2016cv02420
Filed: November 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to California Superior Court for the County of Riverside, Case number BAC1600289, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See document for further details. (iv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennifer Marie Edge-Ballantine v. Paris David Brunner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paris David Brunner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Marie Edge-Ballantine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?