Kenneth Goss v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan
Plaintiff: Kenneth Goss
Defendant: Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan
Case Number: 5:2016cv02475
Filed: December 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym [NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT IN VI, VII, VIII] (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kenneth Goss v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Goss
Represented By: Lisa S Kantor
Represented By: Timothy J Rozelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zimmer Holdings, Inc. Health and Welfare Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?