Jeremiah Randle v. County of San Bernardino et al
| Jeremiah Randle |
| Lillian Aguilar, Bob Bennett, County of San Bernardino, Fabiola Falcone and Roxanne Young |
| 5:2016cv02497 |
| December 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 19, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed a s to defendants Roxanne Young, Bob Bennett, Lillian Aguilar, and Fabiola Falcone for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written respons e on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed as to defendants Roxanne Young, Bob Bennett, Lillian Aguilar, and Fabiola Falcone if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (iv)
|
|
Filing
29
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On May 26, 2017, the Court set a Scheduling Conference. [Doc. # 26 .] As required by the Court's May 26, 2017 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. To date, a Joint Rule 26(f) Report has not been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing no later than July 10, 2017, why sanctions should not be imposed for t heir failure to cooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response. The scheduling conference on July 7, 2017 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee.Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Generally, defendant must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). In the present case, it appears that these time periods hav e not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before May 16, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a written response on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if a written response demonstrating good cause is not filed by the date indicated above. (clee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
