Jose Vela, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Jose Vela, Jr. |
| FCI Lompoc Low, FCI Lompoc Low Health Services, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Doe Flores, Associate Warden Joh Doe, John Doe, Warden John Doe, John Doe Jones, John Doe Long and John Doe Williams |
| 5:2016cv02526 |
| December 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
218
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee, Related to: Order of Dismissal 217 . IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered in favor of Defendants and that this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee for MOTION to Dismiss 190 , Report and Recommendation (Issued) 193 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED and his alternative motion for a stay of proceedings is GRANTED IN PART until March 31, 2021. [Doc. # 190.] The matter is referred back to the Magistrate Judge to address pending motions. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee for MOTION for Leave to file Second Amended Complaint 123 , REQUESTS for Extension of Time to File a Status Report, Order to Protect Plaintiff from Harm, Leave of Staying the SAC , Appointment of Civil Liberties Counselor 139 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is granted in part and denied n part as follows: (a) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file the Proposed Second Amended Complaint and Pr oposed Corrected Second Amended Complaint are denied as written; (b) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint containing solely FTCA claims for damages against the United States based on (i) the April 2014 incident alleged in the First Amended Complaint; and (ii) the treatment of Plaintiff's 2016 infection and meningitis, within 30 days after the entry of this order (see document for further details). (hr)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Dolly M. Gee for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 95 . IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss 77 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss all defendants except the United States is GRANTED and, therefore, Defendants Chatman's and Dorethy's motion to dismiss 97 is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendant United States of America shall file an answer to the First Amended Complaint within 30 days after the entry of this order. (see order for further details). (hr) Modified on 8/31/2018 (hr).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
