Champan R. Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Champan R. Washington
Defendant: Does and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 5:2017cv00054
Filed: January 12, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, as to WELLS FARGO and that a Judgment of Dismissal be entered in favor of WELLS FARGO and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff is awarded nothing in this action against WELLS FARGO. (jp)
May 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge John F. Walter: Plaintiff has failed to file a First Amended Complaint before the deadline. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
March 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is dismissed, with prejudice, as to WELLS FARGO and that a Judgment of Dismissal be entered in favor of WELLS FARGO and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff is awarded nothing in this action against WELLS FARGO. (Case CLOSED). (jp)
February 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, by March 6, 2017 why the Court should not impose sanctions in the amount of $500.00 against Plaintiff or dismiss this action for Plaintiff's fai lure to cooperate with counsel and comply with the Court's Standing Order and Local Rules. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the imposition of sanctions and dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Champan R. Washington v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Steven M Dailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Champan R. Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?