Randy A. Fergerson v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Randy A. Fergerson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 5:2017cv00161
Filed: January 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Scott
Presiding Judge: George H. Wu
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is affirmed and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Joint Stipulation for Social Security Cases 21 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randy A. Fergerson v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy A. Fergerson
Represented By: Laura E Krank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?