Reginald Oden v. Kroger Co The
Plaintiff: Reginald Oden
Defendant: Kroger Co The
Case Number: 5:2017cv00224
Filed: February 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G. Bernal
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal Re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 20 : it is hereby ORDERED that: A. This action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. B. The parties to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. (ad)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reginald Oden v. Kroger Co The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Co The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Oden
Represented By: Brian Joseph Lawler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?