United States of America v. Ardent White
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Ardent White
Case Number: 5:2017cv00332
Filed: February 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery Student Loan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why Ms. White should not be held in contempt of Court for her failure to attend a judgment debtor examination on February 21, 2019, 10:00 a.m.by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/25/2019 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (dts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Ardent White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Kathryn E Van Houten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ardent White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?