William J. Richards v. County of San Bernardino et al
| William J. Richards |
| County of San Bernardino, Does, Daniel Gregonis, Ramos Michael, Mark Nourse, Craig Ogino, Norman Parent, Michael Risley, San Bernardino County District Attorney Office, San Bernardino County Sheriffs Office and Norman Sperber |
| 5:2017cv00497 |
| March 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S. James Otero |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment 138 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment is hereby entered for Defendants. (lc)
|
|
Filing
142
JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: The Court enters the following order on Defendants motion for Summary Judgment as follows: AS TO DEFENDANTS GREGONIS, SPERBER, NOURSE, PARENT, BRADFORD AND NAVARRO: 1) Defendants did not violate Plaintiffs rights. 2) This Court did not reach the issue of qualified immunity, as it found no violation of rights. AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO:(1) Plaintiffs claim for municipal liability under Monell v. Dept. of SocialServices, 436 U.S. 658, 56 L. Ed. 2d 6 11, 98 S. Ct. 2018 (1978) fails because hesuffered no constitutional violation and there is no evidence of an unconstitutional policy, practice, custom, lack of training, or ratification.Accordingly, GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, Defendants Daniel G regonis, Norman Sperber, Tom Bradford, John Navarro, Mark Nourse, Norman Parent, and County of San Bernardino are granted summary judgment in this case and the entire matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice, reasonable costs to be awarded to Defendants in an amount according to proof. (lc)
|
|
Filing
76
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: Order to Show Cause Why Request for Subpoena Should Not Be Denied Due to Jurisdictional Defect. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, on or before January 21, 2019 (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
|
|
Filing
43
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (kca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
