Anthony Stissi v. Bag Fund, LLC et al
| Anthony Stissi |
| Bag Fund, LLC, Does, EBS Escrow, Leo Fasen, Vincent J. Quigg and Stewart Title Guaranty Company |
| 5:2017cv00534 |
| March 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT BAG FUND LLC'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES 132 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 116 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 6/25/2018 (lc).
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 84 ; DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 81 ; DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO STRIKE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 77 85 ; AND DISMISSING CASE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc). Modified on 1/10/2018 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH RULE 26(f) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED to October 2, 2017.The Court ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later thanMonday, September 25, 2017, why they h ave failed to timely comply with theFederal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Courts Order. The Court will discharge this Order and vacate the Scheduling Conference upon the filing of a satisfactory Rule 26(f) Report. Failure to respond to this Order may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. (lc)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than May 17, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: 1. Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant-EBS Escrow; 2. Answer by the defendant(s). See document for details. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
