Hoang Minh Le v. 300 South Diamond Bar Blvd, LLC
Plaintiff: Hoang Minh Le
Defendant: 300 South Diamond Bar Blvd, LLC
Case Number: 5:2017cv00540
Filed: March 22, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson, re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of an Action (Pursuant to FRCP 41a(1)) 15 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hoang Minh Le v. 300 South Diamond Bar Blvd, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 300 South Diamond Bar Blvd, LLC
Represented By: Jeanne M Jorgensen
Represented By: Catherine M Page
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hoang Minh Le
Represented By: Pamela Tsao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?