Monster Energy Company v. Integrated Supply Network, LLC
| Monster Energy Company |
| Integrated Supply Network, LLC |
| Integrated Supply Network, LLC |
| Monster Energy Company |
| 5:2017cv00548 |
| March 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Rozella A. Oliver |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
634
STIPULATED FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION [JS-6] by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED ASFOLLOWS: DEFENDANT ISN IS HEREBY PERMANENTLY ENJOINED FROM: (a) any further manufacturing, distributing, s hipping, advertising, marketing, promoting, importing, displaying, selling or offering to sell (including, but not limited to, through retail outlets, mobile distributors and on any websites or social media such as excesstools.com,tooltopia.com, mobi ledealer.com and monster-tools.com) (collectively the Prohibited Conduct) any products, packaging, labelling or services that bear, display, or include any trademark or name that uses or includes, in whole or in part, the word Monster, or any tradema rk or name confusingly similar thereto, or any variant, derivative, or misspelling of the word Monster, such as Monstrous, Monstrosity, or Monsta (hereinafter Infringing Marks); Pursuant to Rule 65(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this injunction shall bind ISNs officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, successors and assigns, and all other persons who are in active concert or participation with any of the aforementioned persons. Each party will bear its own costs and a ttorneys fees for this action. This Order is not appealable because the parties have agreed to its terms. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for all purposes, including for the purpose of enforcing the terms and provisions of this Stipulated Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. in favor of Monster Energy Company against Integrated Supply Network, LLC Related to: Stipulation for Order 633 . ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ), PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall against Defendant Integrated Supply Network, LLC (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (shb)
|
|
Filing
542
JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Consistent with the jurys verdict (Dkt. Nos. 446, 455), and the Courts Order re: Defendants Rule 50(a) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Rule 50(b) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or Alter native Rule 59 Motion for Remittitur of Damages, or a New Trial; and Plaintiffs Motion For a New Trial on Damages and Willfulness, and a Conditional New Trial on its Rights in the Unregistered Mark Monster (Dkt. No. 539), judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Monster Energy Company, and against Defendant Integrated Supply Network, LLC, in the amount of $1.00 in nominal damages and $5,000,000 in punitive damages. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
|
|
Filing
535
MINUTES OF HEARING RE POST TRIAL MOTIONS held before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: The Court and counsel confer. Following discussions with the parties, the Court advises counsel that the following motions: Plaintiffs Motion for a Permanent Injunction 457 ; Plaintiffs motion for a new trial on damages and willfulness, and a conditional new trial on its rights in the unregistered mark Monster 469 . Defendants Motion to strike material outside the trial record 465 Defendants motion and Rule 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law, Rule 50(b)( renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, or alternative Rule 59 motion for remittitur of damages, or a new trial 473 . Defendants motion for application of laches, fld 12/5/18 480 ; Defendan ts motion for judicial notice 493 .Defendants second motion to strike material outside the trial record re: Plaintiffs motion for new trial on damages and willfulness, and a conditional new trial on its rights in the unregistered mark Monster 494 . Defendants 3rd motion to strike material outside the trial record-re: Plaintiffs reply in support of motion for new trial on damages and wilfulness, and a conditional new trial on its rights in the unregistered mark Monster 501 . Defendants motion to strike and disregard plaintiffs response brief to declaration of Pilkenton 509 are hereby taken under submission and a written order will issue. Court Reporter: Sheri Kleeger. (shb)
|
|
Filing
495
MINUTES OF Plaintiff's Motion for a Permanent Injunction 457 [840 Trademark] Defendant's Motion to Strike Material Outside the Trial Record, filed 12/3/18 465 Hearing held before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. oral argument, the court takes the matters under submission. Court Reporter: Carol Zurborg. (lom)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Plaintiff Monster Energy Company ("MEC") and Defendant Integrated Supply Network, LLC ("ISN"), recognizing that each may have materials containing trade secret o r other confidential research, technical, cost, price, sales, marketing, or other commercial information, as is contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), have agreed to the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order ("Order") as set forth below. The purpose of this Order is to protect the confidentiality of such materials as much as practical during the litigation. 39 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
