Gabriel Caldera v. John Bean Technologies Corporation et al
Gabriel Caldera |
John Bean Technologies Corporation and Does 1 to 20 inclusive |
5:2017cv00615 |
March 30, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Beverly Reid O'Connell |
Patrick J Walsh |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #11 IT IS ORDERED that, as a result of the parties having settled this case, the above-referenced action shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice., (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (rfi) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Gabriel Caldera. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Fakhimi, Houman) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Scheduling Conference set for 7/10/2017 at 01:30 PM before Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. (jp) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES upon filing of the complaint by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. (jp) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 16-05, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:17-cv-00615 BRO (PJWx). (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant John Bean Technologies Corporation. Filed in State Court on 3/27/17 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Document 3 Declaration Matthew Lane Lanein (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 TO 20 inclusive, John Bean Technologies Corporation. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Gabriel Caldera. Filed in State Court on 2/23/17 Submitted with Document 3 Declaration of Matthew P. Lanein. (car) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by DEFENDANT JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Lane, Matthew) |
Filing 5 DEFENDANT JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION'S CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, identifying PLAINTIFF, GABRIEL CALDERA; AND DEFENDANT JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Lane, Matthew) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of JASON CLAYTON re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 TO FEDERAL COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332, 1441, AND 1446 filed by Defendant JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Lane, Matthew) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of MATTHEW P. LANE re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 TO FEDERAL COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332, 1441, AND 1446 filed by Defendant JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Declaration of Matthew Lane, #2 Exhibit B to Declaration of Matthew Lane, #3 Exhibit C to Declaration of Matthew Lane)(Lane, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Lane, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC1703174 Receipt No: 0973-19603203 - Fee: $400, filed by DEFENDANT JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION. (Attorney Matthew Lane added to party JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Lane, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.