Asuncion Martinez Rojo v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Asuncion Martinez Rojo v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Asuncion Martinez Rojo v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Asuncion Martinez Rojo
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	5:2017cv00629
Filed:	April 3, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Steve Kim
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 8, 2018	Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $ 2500. Based upon the parties Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees (Stipulation), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/cents ($2,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. In Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 22 . (clee)
February 6, 2018	Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. It is ADJUDGED that this action is reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (clee)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 8, 2018

Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Fees awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $ 2500. Based upon the parties Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees (Stipulation), IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, ("EAJA) in the amount of TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS and 00/cents ($2,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d), and subject to the terms and conditions of the Stipulation. In Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 22 . (clee)

February 6, 2018

Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. It is ADJUDGED that this action is reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (clee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asuncion Martinez Rojo v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By:	Michael K Marriott
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Asuncion Martinez Rojo
Represented By:	William M Kuntz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?