Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. v. TuffStuff Fitness International, Inc.
| Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. |
| TuffStuff Fitness International Inc. |
| 5:2017cv01388 |
| July 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
300
JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 298 , the Court herebyORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES: Defendant TuffStuff's Accused Products do not infringe the asserted patent claims based on the Court's construction of the "pivotally mounted/ing" terms. The deadline for filing any motions for attorney's fees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and 35 U.S.C. Section 285 shall be stayed pending the disposition of any appeal. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing
212
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Motion seeking to strike portions of the rebuttal expert reports served by Defendant 195 , therelevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United StatesMagistrate Judge 200 . The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections and accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's M otion is (1) GRANTED IN PART and Defendant (a) shall produce Mr. Smith's computer models in native file format, and (b) permit Plaintiff to depose Mr. Smith for up to one hour regarding the computer models; and (2) DENIED IN PART to the extent Plaintiff's Motion seeks to strike portions of the expert rebuttal reports of Mr. Smith and Dr. Sternlicht. (gk)
|
|
Filing
151
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion to Compel; denying 128 MOTION to Amend/Correct and (3) Vacating January 10, 2019 Hearing (dts)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato re Stipulation for Protective Order 63 NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT TO THE STIPULATION pg. 2, line 11 and pg. 16, line 27. (dts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
