Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. TEC Installations, Inc.

Petitioner: Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Respondent: TEC Installations, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2017cv01621
Filed: August 10, 2017
Court: California Central District Court
Presiding Judge: Jesus G. Bernal
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 20, 2018 30 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Pursuant to the Order filed concurrently herewith, Plaintiff Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters Motion for Default Judgment against TEC Installations, Inc. is GRANTED. Plaintiff is AWARDED $12,928.00. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff. 29 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters v. TEC Installations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters
Represented By: Judy H C Juang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TEC Installations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?